Re: Re: protected abstract static function ... E_STRICT

On 12/03/15 09:05, Johannes Ott wrote: > The constructor is doing somethings more, which I didn't write in the > example, so I don't want to reimplement in each subclass. A dynamic > method isValid() might be a solution but I have to think about this, > because maybe the isValid should become a public static function in > future for some needs. One of the problems I found when addressing the E_STRICT issue is that the base classes were the whole problem and one ended up tidying and even duplicating functions and isValid is one of those functions where if $this-> is set you want one path, otherwise you want another. So one ends up with a static safe isValid and an internal isLoaded. In any case even third party libraries needed a little work to ensure E_STRICT compliance and I still hit problems even today althoguh it's been a rule on my systems for the 5+ years. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk