Re: Difficulty with semicolon
| From: | Jeffry Killen | Date: | Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:49:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Difficulty with semicolon | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-326440@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 1:59 PM, David Harkness <david.h@highgearmedia.com> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, empty statements are sometimes needed in real-world code.
>
> while (!keepTrying())
> /* keep trying... */ ;
>
> I added the indentation for clarity. We enforce the use of braces even for one-line blocks like
> this to help.
>
> while (!keepTrying()) {
> /* keep trying... */ ;
> }
>
> That, however, wouldn't have solved your typo. Since we can't remove the ability to
> have empty statements, one could argue for an option to enforce braces for all blocks, but I expect
> the developers would deny such a request with, "just don't make typos!" :) This is
> where a linter can help. You can tell PhpStorm and other editors to disallow one-line blocks without
> braces, and they would flag that line for you.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>
Thanks for the reply.
In an attempt to test an intercept a variable value early in a function execution for an async
request,
I put in a call to file_put_contents and write a text file with the variable value so I could open
the file and
see what its status and value was. Then there re is a return statement so the rest of the code would
not run.
I got a warning: code following return is unreachable.
Also your first example might look in code like
> while (!keepTrying()) /* keep trying... */ ;
Yes the semicolon occurs after the closing parenthesis but it is also after the the last closing
parenthesis in the
construct: something like
do(s)
{// code; }
while(x);
but if you had
do(s);
{ // code}
while(x)
I presume the code after do(s); would run once: would this cause a parse error for trying to
reconcile the while statement
because the do statement needs an associated while statement?
I would think so. I have never used do/while and never had success using while statement, accept
where it is already part
of code I have copied into my scripts and published as freely usable.
But, nonetheless, it is my task to avoid typos.
JK
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Jeffry Killen <jekillen@prodigy.net> wrote:
> Hello;
> This is the second time I have had to deal with this issue.
> It is the result of my own typing errors. But I thought it would
> be worthwhile sharing the implicit problem.
>
> You may notice the line marked '//<<<' There is a semicolon immediately
> following the closing ')'.
>
> This is part of a function to create a directory with a default index.php file
> This code would not run if the directory had not been created successfully.
>
> What happened was that the error implied by file_put_contents returning false
> was sent: EVEN though the file WAS actually created. It appears that the semi
> colon caused the false value to be converted to true and the error was sent.
> Or it just canceled the conditional test and the error block was run with out it.
> (I didn't think it was possible).
>
> So, the take away is that it would be worthwhile for a syntax error to the issued
> in this case. I can't think of any conditional or looping construct that would use
> a semicolon at this location usefully. And lord knows that if you leave one out
> where it needs to be, you hear about it.
>
> $_indTxt = "<?php\n/* code */;\n"."?".">";
> if(file_put_contents($_tar."/index.php", $_indTxt) === false); // <<<
> {
> $_out['error'] = $_errHead." file named ".$_tarShrt."/index.php
> file not created";
> return $_out;
> }
>
> Thanks for time and attention.
> JK
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>