Re: Life getting to complicated?

From: Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:17:26 +0000
Subject: Re: Life getting to complicated?
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-326773@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
You could also add the hostnames and their local addresses into the /etc/hosts file. Pfsense's built in resolver does some interesting things for hosts behind the nat like overriding hostnames for hosts on the local lan. I use these for small businesses all the time. Cheers On April 22, 2019 8:35:43 PM EDT, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com> wrote: >On 22/04/2019 23:29, Lester Caine wrote: >> Thanks that was the kick I needed ... >> >https://community.netgear.com/t5/DSL-Modems-Routers/D7000v2-NAT-Loopback/td-p/1566171 >> is a much better answer, and like the original poster the modem is >now >> re-boxed and ready to go back! What was more annoying is the number >of >> days it took NOT to get this answer from the Netgear support services >> :( And several months on there has been no attempt to fix the problem >> either. > >I'm glad that sent you in the right direction. :-) > >The thread you linked to makes interesting reading, as does your >experience with Netgear tech support. Sadly, it looks like their tech >support is not all that knowledgable. And, worse, Netgear doesn't seem >interested in fixing an obvious bug. One can only presume they take the >view that relatively few people will notice this sort of bug so why >bother. It's not what one would hope for. > >What router are you going with now? If you already run your own >server(s) then you might consider a two box solution such as a VDSL >modem with an OPNSense router/firewall. Alternatively you could flash a >commercial router with DD-WRT or similar, if you fancy. > >> The problem with that is there are multiple websites all resolved to >> the public IP address. One can't simply use the local IP address to >> access them? One has to have 'NAT Loopback' working in this case, >> which it does no the older Netgear D6220 and all the BT Hubs ... It's >> just a pity that all of them seem to have some problem ... >> >> Or is there some way to work around this on the PHP-FPM side of the >> network? > >Yes, you can almost certainly work around it. It's fine that the sites' >domain/host names resolve to the public IP address. As you found, that >works fine for public external access even without NAT loopback >working. > >However, the PHP scripts running on the server all natively see the >server from the private side of the LAN. E.g. Where a script currently >tries to access "server.mydomain.com" then it could instead access >"192.168.1.34", the private IP address of the server. In brief, there's >no need for scripts running on a host on the private LAN to use public >domain names or IP addresses; they can just use private LAN IP >addresses >to reach other LAN servers and thus avoid the need for NAT loopback. >This of course does not prevent external users from accessing the >servers via the public IP address. > >If some of the script access other websites or servers using HTTP >(which >obviously presumes the use of host headers) then you can just add the >private IP address of the server to the host headers entry of the web >server configuration. > >If you provide more details of the PHP you're using then I can be more >specific about what to change. > >-- >Mark Rousell > > > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

« previous php.general (#326773) next »