Re: Performance question

From: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 20:08:23 +0000
Subject: Re: Performance question
References: 1 2  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-34086@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
has anyone ran any test to see what kind of performance hit? I know people are allways ranting and raving about single or double quotes regarding performance and people ranting and raving about HTML in or out of echo statements. the performance hit just isnt amazing, use what you want I figure, use whats easier to read. IMHO the last example is the hardest to read. please please everyone post your own results wether you wan tto back me or slash me. <? for ($c = 0; $c < 10000000; $c++) { echo "A"; } ?> [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.82user 0.07system 0:25.76elapsed 92%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (448major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.19user 0.09system 0:24.03elapsed 96%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (447major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.27user 0.14system 0:26.84elapsed 87%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (447major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps //----------------- <? for ($c = 0; $c < 10000000; $c++) { echo 'A'; } ?> [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.24user 0.01system 0:23.25elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (448major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.17user 0.10system 0:23.28elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (447major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.17user 0.08system 0:23.25elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (447major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps //------------------- <? for ($c = 0; $c < 10000000; $c++) { ?>A<? } ?> [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.26user 0.05system 0:23.58elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (757major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.21user 0.06system 0:23.28elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (447major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps [lee@server lee]$ time php -q test_1.php > /dev/null 23.27user 0.02system 0:23.34elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (447major+2606minor)pagefaults 0swaps Chris Lee Mediawaveonline.com "Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams" <ignacio@openservices.net> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.30.0101111421110.2534-100000@terbidium.openservices.net... > On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, John Guynn wrote: > > > Do I pay a performance penality for calling a file that only contains html > > code .php or .php3? In otherwords what is the php parser overhead if there > > is no php code in the file? > > > > John Guynn > > > > This email brought to you by RFCs 821 and 1225. > > > > Yes, because that file will be put through the parser regardless of whether or > not there's any PHP in it. > > -- > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ignacio@openservices.net> > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >

« previous php.general (#34086) next »