Re: DocBook Editors?

A lot of technical people aren't keen on WYSIWYG editors. Especially when dealing with something like docbook that is designed to generate documentation in dozens of formats. vim with its syntax colouring or emacs with its validation mode really do a good job. I have been writing a lot of docbook stuff lately for work and I find I am an order of magnitude more productive than I ever was using something like Word. -Rasmus On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Alex Black wrote: > hi all, > > anyone found a good graphical SGML editor for any platform that's no a > fortune? > > http://www.adobe.com/store/products/framemakersgml.html > > It would be really annoying to have to write a bunch of documentation for > binarycloud inside an plaintext xml document. > > I'm surprised DocBook has gained so much support given the apparent lack of > good tools for authoring. > > ? > > _alex > > > -- > Alex Black, Head Monkey > enigma@turingstudio.com > > The Turing Studio, Inc. > http://www.turingstudio.com > > vox+510.666.0074 > fax+510.666.0093 > > Saul Zaentz Film Center > 2600 Tenth St Suite 433 > Berkeley, CA 94710-2522 > > > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >