Re: <? PHP vs. <?

From: Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:32:19 +0000
Subject: Re: <? PHP vs. <?
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-35138@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Short open tags won't work with xml. Therefore they won't work with > xhtml. They conflict with where the Web is going. Aha! Yet another reason not to use <?= :-) philip On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Michael Talbot-Wilson wrote: > Ye 2001-01-17 13:54 -0500, Toby Butzon skribis: > > > > > Is PHP the implied script, so that it is okay to begin PHP code like > > this <? > > > > vs. like this <?php > > > > When is it not implied? > > > > > > You should use <?php. In future versions the open short tag would be > > > dropped or your administrator can disable the open short tag. > > > > Are there in fact plans to drop the short tags? > > Short open tags won't work with xml. Therefore they won't work with > xhtml. They conflict with where the Web is going. > > Thus, they have already been dropped. You don't _need_ them. Stay > away from them. > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >

« previous php.general (#35138) next »