Re: Future plans (4.1) ?

Hi Rasmus, thanks for you reply. As some of the phpers already stated I also disagree about the visibility issue. But it's IMHO anyway (besides I do not have technical skills enough to try to implement it). I'll check the template you mentioned but I was wondering if a "built-in" one would not give a better integration and give php users a "standard" way... So what's in the TODO list for a 4.1 release ? Thanks again --- Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@php.net> wrote: > > For a fast templating system, see Smarty. > http://www.phpinsider.com/php/code/Smarty/ > > As for better OO. I think many of the things people > ask for, like > visibility (public,private,protected) class > properties, aren't actually > features that add functionality, but more just > convenience features that > could be implemented in user space. > > For example, you could establish a convention that > said that any class > property that starts with an _underscore should be > considered a private > property, and one would hope that your UML tool > could be configured to > understand that. __________________________________________________ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/