Re: General question :)
| From: | Godd | Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:47:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: General question :) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-45644@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Execution time!!!!!!
Big files if not well developed = large exec time meaning server timeouts.
small files = less timeouts and better debugging and modularity which ALWAYS
better. Modularity allows you to plug in and pull out pages with out
rendering you whole site unusable.
Of course you can have a few big files and some small files with it, depends
on what the big files do, Classes and common functions can be grouped
together.
""FredrikAT"" <ftakle@online.no> wrote in message
news:99o8pm$480$1@toye.p.sourceforge.net...
> Hi!
>
> What do you think is best..:
> - have alot of small .php (files)?
> - or a few big?
>
> What's good & bad with these solutions?!
>
> ---------------------------------
> Fredrik A. Takle
> Bergen, Norway
> fredrik@takle.net
>
>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
>