Re: output buffering

From: Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 01:57:05 +0000
Subject: Re: output buffering
References: 1 2  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-47375@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I know what you mean. Until I decided to kill all but one single echo/print call, which is in a function I call at the bottom of the script, I often ran into problems where I needed to echo something at the top of a really really long control loop, but nested deep within it I had to set a cookie or use a redirect. Which is why I killed all my echo/print calls in favor of a single function which I include at the bottom of my script ;) -- Plutarck Should be working on something... ...but forgot what it was. "Christian Dechery" <lemming@vento.com.br> wrote in message news:5.0.0.25.2.20010405225317.02404cd0@pop-gw.vento.com.br... > At 00:26 5/4/2001 -0500, Plutarck wrote: > >http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.outcontrol.php > > > >If you want to use output buffering you must use the ob_* family of > >functions. > > > >In any script where you want it used you _must_ use it explicitly, or so do > >in an included file. Unless you can change the php.ini, there is no way to > >force all pages to use output buffering. I don't reccommend you do such a > >thing anyway. > > > >If you aren't using output compression all it does is allow bad programming > >practices. One exception is for hosting companies that want to force ads to > >be displayed on the page with the auto_prepend type settings. > > > > > >Output buffering should only be used if you have a specific reason for doing > >so. Kind of like all PHP functions :) > > > >It doesn't cost much in performance except when a script pumps out a very > >large amount of data. If you want to print a 10mb text file to the browser > >it is a considerably _BAD_ idea to force PHP to buffer that all up into one > >chunk before puking it out. > > > > > >But, enter the gz_handler functions. If you want to compress your output, > >then you have a reason for using output buffering. The cost in performance > >varies widely, but if your server is already under a considerable load you > >probably shouldn't use it. > > > >But it's very cool to use if you have the extra processor power, but wait > >for 4.0.5 to do it. Many people complain about memory leaks and sub-standard > >output buffering functions. It's supposed to all be fixed in the new > >version, so feel free to play around with it :) > > > >Still, it's better to be able to set it only in the places you want it run > >rather than making all output use it. > > exactly... I don't want to set this option to an entire site just because > of one little script I'm having trouble setting a header() or > setcookie()... and I wanna use them in the middle of the output... > something like ASP's <% response.flush=true %>, it can be set anywhere u > want... > but of course... the best way is to code right and not to mess with headers > once the output has started... but sometimes I wish I could, u know? It > would really make somethings a lot simpler... > ____________________________ > . Christian Dechery (lemming) > . http://www.tanamesa.com.br > . Gaita-L Owner / Web Developer > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >

« previous php.general (#47375) next »