Re: here doc performance

To my knowledge, though I haven't done any testing with microtime, heredoc is as faster as using single quotes. Since the only thing PHP looks for is the characters that were present at the very begining on the string, there should certainly be no slowdowns at all. If it's not that way, I imagine it would be just a bad implementation which will be fixed soon. But I strongly doubt a bad implementation of here doc printing was made. -- Plutarck Should be working on something... ...but forgot what it was. ""Jack Dempsey"" <dempsejn@georgetown.edu> wrote in message news:NEBBKBGAMLPMIDAJEALPKEMACGAA.dempsejn@georgetown.edu... > Hi all, > > I use the here doc option heavily in pages i create, outputting large chunks > of HTML with variables inside the echo<<<EOF ...... EOF; syntax...is there a > better way to do this? I'm wondering if anyone knows of running times for > things like that...i would think that it'd be better than going back and > forth between php and html (certainly easier), wouldn't have to escape the > quotes like you would if you used > echo " > > lots of html > ... > > "; > > Any thoughts on this? > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >