Re: Numerical refs to assoc array suddenly "undefined offset"??

No.. if you are referencing $my_arr['foo'] ==> then $my_array[0] will not be set. I think it used to work that way, but it stopped. If you want to print it out... use $my_array['foo'] If you don't need the associative referencing, you can just use $my_array[], which will set $my_array[0] If you want to print out your array elements in order, use: while (list ($key, $val) = each ($my_array)) { echo "$key => $val<br>"; } Brian Tanner Project Manager Zaam Internet Solutions Toll Free: 1-866-225-2675 info@zaam.com http://www.zaam.com "CC Zona" <cczona@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:9hico0$l4l$1@w153.z064000151.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net... > This is weird. Did I only imagine that PHP allows numerical referencing of > associative array elements? 'Cuz suddenly the parser is calling all the > numerical references "undefined". > > ex. > $my_arr['foo']='first'; > $my_arr['bar']='second'; > $my_arr['more']='third'; > > echo "<p>" . $my_arr[0] . "</p>\n"; > echo "<p>" . $my_arr[1] . "</p>\n"; > echo "<p>" . $my_arr[2] . "</p>\n"; > > for($i=0;$i<count($my_arr);$i++) > { > echo "<p>" . $my_arr[$i] . "</p>\n"; > } > > ex. > $my_arr=array( > 'foo'=>'first', > 'bar'=>'second', > 'more'=>'third' > ); > > echo "<p>" . $my_arr[0] . "</p>\n"; > echo "<p>" . $my_arr[1] . "</p>\n"; > echo "<p>" . $my_arr[2] . "</p>\n"; > > for($i=0;$i<count($my_arr);$i++) > { > echo "<p>" . $my_arr[$i] . "</p>\n"; > } > > The above spits out nothing but a page full of "undefined offset" errors. > I can't find anything in the arrays chapter, nor in the array function > reference, to explain why the numerical referencing would've stopped > working. This *should* work, right? So why would it not be working now? > > -- > CC > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >