Re: Sessions and redundant servers
| From: | lists at tech dot intelinet dot ro | Date: | Thu, 05 Jul 2001 20:54:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Sessions and redundant servers | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-56384@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Daniel Baldoni wrote:
> Considering NFS is stateless, why do you consider it to be a more acceptable
> solution to, say, rsync (which I personally don't like - but that's another
> matter)?
Ok, sorry, I should have explained my reasoning.
Afaik rsync executes periodically to synchronize files between two
stations (correct me if I am wrong), but changes are not mirrored
instantly. Please correct me if I am wrong.
With NFS, changes are instant because they are stored on a central NFS
server, just as it happens with db storage solutions.
That's why I said that rsync does not seem a viable solution.
georgeb