Re: Web application?

It all depends on your application, the use it receives, your server hardware (mainly RAM), and your MySQL/PHP configurations. For 90% of web applications, and 90% of the loads they receive, any confiuguration of MySQL would be fine. But describe your scenario and we should be able to let you know if all will be OK. /* Chris Lambert, CTO - chris@whitecrown.net WhiteCrown Networks - More Than White Hats Web Application Security - www.whitecrown.net */ ----- Original Message ----- From: Yves Gauvreau <cyg@sympatico.ca> To: <php-general@lists.php.net>; Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@php.net> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] Web application? | Is that to say that mySQL is not a good choice in this situation? | | If you would be so kind. Why would mySQL be the bottleneck and why PHP | would not? | | Regards. | | Yves | | | Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: | | > Should be fine. Chances are your bottleneck will be your database, not | > PHP. | > | > -Rasmus | > | > On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Yves Gauvreau wrote: | > | > | >>Hi, | >> | >>The question is this: Say I have a large main script that handles most | >>of the request if not all, I wonder what are the effect of this approach | >>on performance in a situation where we have a fair number of concurrent | >>users? | >> | >>Situation: | >> | >>Server: | >>P4 1300, Linux (RH 7.1), Apache, MOD_PHP, mySQL. | >> | >>Thanks | >> | >>Yves Gauvreau | >> | >> | >> | >> | > | | | | -- | PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) | To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net | For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net | To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net | | |