Re: [HELP! searching performance info]
| From: | Jack Sasportas | Date: | Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:18:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [HELP! searching performance info] | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-5910@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
FYI: Here are the latest Benchmarks and information for performance and serving
up web pages...
Go Linux !
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-07-05-001-04-OP
Doug Semig wrote:
> Your problems will probably not be because of PHP. PHP is as "scalable" as
> Apache if you're running PHP as an Apache module because PHP becomes part
> of Apache. If you're running PHP as a CGI application, it becomes as
> scalable as the OS and Apache combined because that's the platform you're
> using when running it that way.
>
> Any performance problems you encounter will be related to application
> design, the quality of the code that implements the application, and/or
> inadequate capacity planning.
>
> I wouldn't advocate a Microsoft solution for almost anything anymore, but I
> suspect that a Microsoft platform could handle your app with a little bit
> more work. After finding the problems with your app as it was implemented
> in ASP, you could have taken the next step and wrote particularly
> time-intensive portions as OCXs (or whatever they're calling them this
> month) and registering it with MTS on every server in the farm. I'd
> recommend the exact same thing with PHP! If you find something that PHP
> isn't doing as fast as you need or like, code the algorithms up in C and
> call them with PHP.
>
> No matter what platform you choose, though, you'll have to throw a bit of
> hardware at this project. A hundred thousand people hitting a site at an
> average (I pulled this out of my hat because only you and your users can
> really estimate this) of 25 page hits per hour is 2.5M page hits per hour
> or 41,667 page hits per minute or 694 page hits per second. Let's say that
> an average page has about 4 graphics, you'll be hitting the web server an
> average of 3,470 ((1 HTML + 4 graphics) * 694 = 3,470) requests per second.
> If you triple this (because you're in a real-world situation and not a
> benchmarking situation and because you're not serving up static pages),
> you'll find that you need more power than a single box can provide (even a
> quad Xeon, which seems to be a favorite "high-end" server to benchmark on).
> It looks like linux can handle somewhere between 1,000 and 2,000 requests
> per second in most of the benchmarks on
> http://www.kegel.com/nt-linux-benchmarks.html. So let's
> just say it can
> deal with 1,000. We've already included a fudge-factor for scripted
> content and real-world file sizes when tripling the 3,470 requests per
> second, so we figure that we need enough servers to handle 10,410 requests
> per second. That's eleven servers we'd require to handle the load. If it
> were my project, I'd probably start with a cluster of four to six servers
> (optimized all to heck and back!) and I'd be prepared to double the number
> of servers. You're in a much better position to calculate the capacity
> requirements a lot better than I can, though. There are many things to
> consider. For example, if your users do not all work the same 5 hours per
> day, the load is distributed throughout the day and you will need nowhere
> near this number of servers!
>
> The backend database is a whole different ballgame. I don't even know
> where to go for even rudimentary performance benchmarks. Even the site
> mentioned above doesn't have much info on database benchmarks. So I cannot
> begin to calculate what you'd need for it.
>
> HTH (even a little),
> Doug
>
> At 04:45 PM 7/10/00 +0200, Paco Ortiz wrote:
> ... snip ...
> >we are talking about 20000 to 100000 authentified (non-anonymous) people
> >accessing a Web on a regular basis (they MUST work there for at least 5
> >hours a day, so imagine ~10e7 hits a day). The web has a customized
> >behaviour for every user (typical notebook, agenda, custom static contents,
> >access to resources...).
> >
> >(*boss leaves smiling*)
> >(*sysadmin evacuated to the nearest hospital*)
> >
> >It's about 300 complex scripts + 10-100 GB of static contents
> >(files,HTML,images). We also estimate a 10-100 GB database.
> ... snip ...
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net
--
___________________________________________________________
Jack Sasportas
Innovative Internet Solutions
Phone 305.665.2500
Fax 305.665.2551
www.innovativeinternet.com
www.web56.net