RE: [PHP] 3rd include

I searched the database and did not find anything. I was not sure if the bug could possibly be entered under a different title, though. It is discussed in the manual errata for the include() function, so I would assume the developers at least know of it. --Drew Vogel On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Mark Roedel wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Drew P. Vogel [mailto:dvogel@intercarve.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:51 PM >> To: php-general@lists.php.net >> Subject: [PHP] 3rd include >> >> >> Has the "3rd include" bug (where variable definitions are >> "lost" at the 3rd include), been fixed yet? > >The obvious way to answer this question would be to look it up in the >database at bugs.php.net. Any idea whether it's actually gotten entered >there? (I tried searching for '3rd', 'third', and 'three' -- >'include' >just got way more results than I was interested in sifting through -- >and didn't see anything that appeared to match what you're describing... > > >--- >Mark Roedel | "This is the perversity of software. It >Systems Programmer | is *always* more complex than you >LeTourneau University | anticipate, even when you know this and >Longview, Texas, USA | compensate for it." --Robert Martin >