Re: php's future

So, we can say that on scripts that accomplish absolutely nothing, jsp is faster than php - I can live with that :) Most of my scripts do accomplish something (intended or not!) ;) Tim wrote:

Actually, an optimizing Java compiler would have detected it was a "dead loop" (i.e. didn't actually do anything) and just skipped it, meaning it took four seconds just to load the JSP page and invoke the bean. :) :) The only benchmarks that mean anything are your actual web applications running on your actual servers...anything else is only speculation. - Tim http://www.phptemplates.org On Sun, 2001-09-02 at 15:08, Mark Charette wrote:

And, of course, the JSP was running 20000 x 20000 iterations, or 400,000,000 iterations, in a few seconds. Yeah, right.

-- _______ ___ _ ____ _____ Chris Hobbs / ____\ \ / / | | |/ ___\| __ \ Head Geek | (___ \ \ / /| | | | (___ | | | | WebMaster \___ \ \ \/ / | | | |\___ \| | | | PostMaster ____) | \ / | |__| |____) | |__| | \____/ \/ \____/ \____/|_____/ http://www.silvervalley.k12.ca.us chobbs@silvervalley.k12.ca.us