Re: ImageCopyResampled() versus ImageCopyResized()

From: Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 02:08:59 +0000
Subject: Re: ImageCopyResampled() versus ImageCopyResized()
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-66145@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I use it all the time and it is MUCH better. -- Gaylen "Dgoddard" <dgoddard@xmission.com> wrote in message news:20010825105057.6933.qmail@pb1.pair.com... > Has anyone out there used ImageCopyResampled()? This function was added in > PHP 4.0.6 and requires GD 2.0.1 or later. So I haven't been able to try it > out yed. > > I'm just wondering if it will deliver better image quality when you use it > to render a shrunk-version of a graphic than ImageCopyResized(), which has > been available for some time. > > Thanks, > > -D > >

« previous php.general (#66145) next »