RE: [PHP] Performance: PHP vs. Visual Basic

From: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:00:39 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP] Performance: PHP vs. Visual Basic
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-67555@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I would agree that the DB is probably the biggest bottleneck... Are you connecting to the DB via ODBC? I'm not an expert at DB stuff outside of the MySQL realm, but I've heard many say ODBC is horribly slow. I don't know ASP that well, but could someone comment on ADODB? It uses OLEDB, not ODBC, correct? I've read that OLEDB is much faster. First and foremost, as Michael said, optimize your SQL... That's the first thing I'd do... Then, check and see how you are connecting to the DB... I think I can safely say, that if you switch to PHP/MySQL, that using MySQL native libs to connect to the database are fastest... But I have been wrong in the past... -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kimsal [mailto:michael@wings.themusicguide.com] Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 11:54 PM To: Masami Kawakami Cc: php forum Subject: Re: [PHP] Performance: PHP vs. Visual Basic Much as I don't like to defend MS, I'll take a stab here. By 40-50 people in an office, I presume you're talking about an intranet of some type - 40-50 aren't constantly hitting it (meaning 40-50 requests per second all the time), but 40-50 are using it throughout the day for various tasks. You don't give the machine specs, but I'd hazard to say, if it's moderate equipment, that there's some DB optimization (or VB optimization) that could be done. 40 people lightly hitting a machine shouldn't cause much of a problem regardless of language used, unless there's some extremely bad coding going on. Are you closing DB connections? Are you avoiding putting objects in session and/or application scope? Are the DB queries optimized properly (proper indices on tables, etc)? Those are just a few things I'd look for. Yeah it'd be great to have you switch to PHP, but some optimization issues are universal, and if it's written poorly in one language, chances are it'll be written poorly in another. Regardless of this, we still recommened PHP to most clients because of the cost issue as well. However, since you've already paid for this software you're running (right?) it's probably worth it to take a while to optimize what you've got first. -------------------- Michael Kimsal http://www.tapinternet.com 734-480-9961 On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Masami Kawakami wrote: > Maybe this is one of FAQ, Please give me a URL of this kind of > comparison page, or your experience. > > A web server program is running in my office. It consists of Visual > Basic, IIS, and MS SQL Server on Windows 2000. although the > performance is confortable for few users, it is terribly slow for > 40-50 users. Once all of them start to use, it takes more than 20 > seconds to open a page in client browser. > > To improve the performance, we have an idea to use, instead of > Microsoft, PHP, Apache, and mySQL/ProgreSQL on Linux. How much will be > the improvement? > > We also have plan to enhance the hardware, 1PC for DataBase, 2nd and > 3rd for IIS or Apaches. Which has better scalability, VB or PHP? > > > > -- > Masami Kawakami <mkwkm@worldnet.att.net> > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net To > contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net

« previous php.general (#67555) next »