Re: Namo Web Editor

> I always depreciated WYSIWYG software, especially when they mention > those things about HTML. HTML is the alphabet of the internet and as > such should be well known by any webmaster and whoever else is > interested in this kind of software. > > Still, it feels like it is better than Dreamveawer and Microsoft > FrontPage (oh boy, I pronounced devil's name) Exactly my thoughts but it seems we are more in the minority. My neighbor mentioned his girlfriend taking a web class and he complained that they use Notepad for their editing. "Who uses Notepad?", he asked. Yet he was suprised when she was showing him a thing or two. WYSIWYG editors are nice for general things like layout (I use Dreamweaver to help layout any table in a table stuff) but I haven't ran across a editor yet that makes solid code. Joel