Re: PHP / SSL
| From: | TD - Sales International Holland B.V. | Date: | Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:05:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP / SSL | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-78442@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thursday 20 December 2001 15:37, Jon Farmer stuffed this into my mailbox:
256 bit encryption should be crackable by not too much more people than
Microsoft, the US government, China and perhaps some others with shitloads of
money that CAN dissapear (within reasonable time). Else there will be
questions. Personally I found it hard to believe as well. But I'm told that
you can have the same power for like $ 100.000,- by buying the best
price/performance now. Make no mistake, those machines only need a mainboard,
cpu, cooler, powersupply and a network card. Even better, we're thinking
about x86 hardware (you and me) be appearantly there is hardware on the
market that was specifically crafted to decrypt stuff brute force. One of
those would probably match like a 100 or maybe even a 1000 of the P-II 266
distributed.net has. Now if you're sure you can make $ 200.000,- by the
credit card numbers/other info you gain from cracking it, it is already worth
the effort.
Btw, an Athlon 1400 does 5,3 MKeys per SECOND (RC5-64)!! and those are damn
cheap.......
> > I urge you strongly to advise against that. Although it might be possible
>
> to
>
> > downgrade your encryption to 40bit I'd like to make you aware of the fact
> > that DES which is 56 bit encryption if I'm not mistaken was cracked
>
> several
>
> > times by brute force in UNDER 22 hours by the distributed.net people
> > (www.distributed.net). Therefore I would NOT consider 40 bits encryption
>
> safe
>
> > and I feel obligated to make you aware of that. You are warned now :-) so
>
> do
>
> > as you please.
>
> Erm, yeah true.... but by their own admission they used the equivalant of
> 160000 PII 266Mhz machines to accomplish this. If you think someone is
> going to want your data and has those kinda resources available then yeah
> go for higher. However if thats your worry where are you going to stop in
> the length of your key? If your that paranoid then it shouldn't be using
> public networks in the first place!!