Re: Suggestions for the next php

Hello, Stephano Mariani wrote: > > I believe fork is very expensive in terms of performance. > One should consider that in the case of server modules (ISAPI in > particular) a huge overhead is incurred when forking. I better > alternative would be the vfork call. Or better still, the __clone call. I don't know exactly what pcntl uses. From the programmer point of view, the principle is the same as fork. > Do you know of any ways to implement this without changes to the php > codebase itself? I doubt it is possible for an just extension to do > this, it need the php core to support this. Ask Jason Greene. Regards, Manuel Lemos