RE: [PHP] Shorthand for variable format translation

Personally I like that idea, especially the $[%]foo = foofunction($foo); That would be the best way. John -----Original Message----- From: Greg Billock [mailto:billgr@optics.caltech.edu] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 6:56 PM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] Shorthand for variable format translation What do folks think of this idea? The idea being, for some variable $foo, it is frequently desired to a. put it in the database using addslashes($foo); b. use it in an form control using htmlspecialchars($foo); c. include it in a linkable URL using urlencode($foo); perhaps more. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to use a shorthand for these frequent translations of variables by being able to use just: a. (for database) $/foo b. (for htmlchars) $>foo c. (for urlencode) $%foo etc. The mnemonics hopefully being obvious. :-) Perhaps even a user-defined shorthand, like $[non-variable-beginning-char]variable is-mapped-to SomeFunction($variable) some other ideas..... $|foo maps a variable into some standard PHP XML format; $:foo maps to serialize(foo), $_foo maps to a WDDX-encoded format; $#foo maps to strlen($foo) or count($foo) [this would mimic perl]. Obviously this wouldn't be intended to replace existing functionality, just to provide a shorthand for these very-common web applications tasks and produce ever-more-inscrutable code. :-) -Greg -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net