RE: [PHP] require() vs include()
| From: | Non-HP-Boise,ex1) | Date: | Thu, 14 Mar 2002 23:56:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] require() vs include() | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-88597@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
They are much the same, both "include" a file.
To quote the PHP manual "require() and include() are identical in every way
except how they handle failure. include() produces a Warning while require()
results in a Fatal Error. In other words, don't hesitate to use require() if
you want a missing file to halt processing of the page. include() does not
behave this way, the script will continue regardless. Be sure to have an
appropriate include_path setting as well."
That said I would use require_once and include_once instead of just include
and require, these functions ensure the file is only included once which
prevents a lot of problems.
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: David McInnis [mailto:david@dataovation.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:47 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] require() vs include()
Are these redundant functions or are they different? I seem to be able
to use the interchangeably.
David McInnis
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php