RE: [PHP] --> I N C L U D E < -- O R --> F O P E N < -- ?
| From: | Maxim Maletsky \(PHPBeginner.com\) | Date: | Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:34:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] --> I N C L U D E < -- O R --> F O P E N < -- ? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-94494@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Hi,
>
> I am not a PHP programmer. (Sorry Guys;-)
> Although, I am working on a PHP portal type site, where I need to
> integrate as seemlessly(?) as possible an outside specialized leased
> Search Engine Service done with ASP (I suppose? ".asp").
yup, probably ASP.
> I have been looking everywhere for this info. Just can't seem to get
> it all together.
> I done some tests but the images acompanying the Search form are not
> following. I suppose if I ask the them to put absolute paths... ?
you can combine your own. If the images returned have an absolute path,
not URL (without http://..., like: /dir/file.png) all you have to do is
to figure out what the URL is and then compose it yourself.
> --- 1. Is it technically possible with PHP to interact with the
> engine's pages and the results it pushs so that it feels as if it was
> part of the site?
Yes
> --- 2. I don't understand the differences between "include" ,
> "fopen" and even "@fopen".
> What would be the best way to do the job if it is "doable" of course
;-)
For remote access they are kind of similar. Use include, it is easier to
learn.
Try this;
<?
Include('http://www.google.com');
?>
you will see the whole google under your domain name.
Sincerely,
Maxim Maletsky
Founder, Chief Developer
www.PHPBeginner.com // where PHP Begins