Re: lookin for a Menuing System...
| From: | David Freeman | Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2002 06:00:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: lookin for a Menuing System... | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-95105@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 29 Apr 2002 at 0:46, michael kimsal wrote:
> Can someone point me to hardware that is still in active use that can't
> handle javascript?
Hardware? No.
> Similarly, can someone point me to a company that specifically disables
> javascript as 'corporate policy'? Back in 96-97, the 'no javascript'
Hmmm, not specifically. Although, I can think of at least one large
organisation with a WAN that would have thousands of computers that
specifically _ADDS_ their own javascript-based navigation to the top
of every single page in the browser. This particular behaviour will
break any javascript mouse-over that doesn't specifically name, and
use by name, mouse-overs.
The point in a network the size of the Internet you just don't know.
A good web programmer is going to take into account that some people
will deliberately disable javascript. For those people you get a
choice. Either ignore them or take them into account. It's your
decision. Just because everyone else does it is not enough reason.
Few web designers take the blind into account when designing but that
doesn't mean it's right. In fact, here in Australia the Sydney
Olympics web site was the subject of (winning if I recall) legal
action over it's inaccessibility to the blind.
There are ways to make sure your wonderful web design will still work
if javascript isn't present. There are design rules that will leave
your website mostly navigable to people using text-based browsers.
There are ways to degrade capabilities gracefully, and ways to
disable badly.
An example of badly is to basically tell someone to "bugger off"
because they don't have 'xxx' (where 'xxx' is whatever technology you
want to use, be it javascript, java, flash, etc, etc). If they can
figure out you don't have it and give you a message about it then
they can insert something that leaves the site functional - even if
not as "nice" an experience.
> IMO, it's now like targetting only websafe colors because some people
> might only browse in 256 colors. If they do that, about 80% of the
> web's content will look like crap anyway, and they won't specifically
> think my stuff looks all that much worse than anyone else's.
Depends on your audience. I fair percentage of computer owners never
adjust their screen resolution from whatever it was delivered at. If
the store left it at 800x600x256 then they will never change it even
if it's capable of more. I know of at least one organisation that
was running 17" monitors at 640x480x256 because that's how they were
set up when delivered! Weren't they surprised when we changed it for
them...
CYA, Dave