Re: PHP compared to JSP
| From: | Paras Mukadam | Date: | Sat, 04 May 2002 16:07:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP compared to JSP | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-96055@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thanks for that !
But my question still remains the same ... does PHP alone (without ZEND)
compile code into some .compiled_PHP file so that the user loading same page
for 2nd time gets better response than the 1st time?
Regards,
Paras.
"Matt Friedman" <matt@sprynewmedia.com> wrote in message
news:001401c1f37c$6bc34c60$46f6fea9@bgm.globeinteractive.com...
> JSP does not ever run in the browser. JSP is a server side technology
> designed to compete with ASP. PHP is similar in that it too is a server
> side language and can be embedded into html pages. Java tends to be
> considerably slower than PHP but the Java folks have made great strides
> towards overcoming this. As far as compiling scripts, both Java and PHP
> are capable of doing this if the correct software is installed on the
> server. In PHP's case this is the Zend Optimizer - in the case of Java,
> I am not certain but I think this would require a Sun web server; both
> solutions cost $$$. However, as far as PHP is concerned there are many
> open source free caching solutions available. This is perhaps true for
> Java as well. Unless your site is going to get many users per second
> this is probably not necessary. Ultimately, running LAMP (Linux, Apache,
> MySQL and PHP) will cost less and is probably faster. Many solutions, to
> my knowledge, requiring Java cost $$$ while LAMP is completely Open
> source. (Read the licenses for more info).
>
> Matt Friedman
>
>