Re: is $HTTP_REFERER worth trusting?

From: Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:17:36 +0000
Subject: Re: is $HTTP_REFERER worth trusting?
References: 1 2  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-97890@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello "Dan Hardiker" <dhardiker@staff.firstcreative.net>, Then, it is not safe to do IP-based blocking, right? Any alternative? On Thu, 16 May 2002 10:10:44 +0100 (BST) "Dan Hardiker" <dhardiker@staff.firstcreative.net> wrote: > > Craig Vincent wrote: > > The best thing you can do is temporarily record the > > IPs of connections to your script, and then block IPs that connect to > > the script too often directly from your routing table. It doesn't > > necessarily stop those using proxies but definately is more reliable > > than an HTTP_REFERER protection scheme. > > If you are expecting to have a wide (uncontrolled) audience for the data > you are outputting I would strongly suggest against doing this as the > majority of major ISPs operate transparent web proxies - where everyone > from that ISP will appear to be coming from the same IP. > If I was a malitious user, I would get a block of 50 IPs, place them on a > unix box and then bind randomly to the IPs when making the calls... making > the work around for this security measure trivial. > Im not saying you shouldnt implement any method of security, as some > security is far better than none! Just making sure that everyone is aware > of the consequences and implications. > > -- > Dan Hardiker [dhardiker@staff.firstcreative.net] > ADAM Software & Systems Engineer > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Patrick Hsieh <pahud@pahud.net> GPG public key http://pahud.net/pubkeys/pahudatpahud.gpg

« previous php.general (#97890) next »