Re: Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? Part 2
| From: | Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos | Date: | Wed, 22 May 2002 15:20:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? Part 2 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-98746@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Jimmy Lantz wrote:
> Thanx for the suggestions!
> Someone mentioned that I could use MD5 and then encrypt the hash,
> how would I ever decrypt that? Is'nt MD5 a 1-way thing only?
>
> Another question?
> Should I go for bigger keylength or bigger blocksize or both? What makes
> for the best encryption?
Does it really make a difference? I'm not exactly crypto-literate, but the idea is to encrypt
the thing so that it's not visible by Foo Bar even if he does break into your system. If
someone is competent enough to break Mcrypt's 128/256bit cyphers, then it doesn't really
matter if you use the "weak" or the "strong" ones. I've used 256bit
Rijndael in CBC mode, but I wouldn't feel more/less safe if it was CFB or if it was 3DES.
Just my 2c.
--thalis
>
> / Jim
>
> (and before someone suggest that I read the book Applied cryptography it's
> already orderd and on it's way :-) )