Re: comment followed by ?> fails to parse
| From: | Ed Gorski | Date: | Tue, 28 May 2002 21:04:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: comment followed by ?> fails to parse | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-99566@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
From my experience the PHP parser acts much like the HTML parser in the fact that it doesn't give a damn about carriage returns....
ed
At 03:01 PM 5/28/2002 -0600, Kevin Stone wrote:
Exactly.. it doesn't seem to make any sense. Esspecially since it's such as absolutely incredibly undeniably easy thing to check for. :) If the code doesn't end with an uncommented ?> then just parse the code as text. That's what it does anyway so why catch commented code at all? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johnson, Kirk" <kjohnson@zootweb.com> To: <php-general@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:55 PM Subject: RE: [PHP] comment followed by ?> fails to parse Which begs the question, why does PHP see a '?>' in a '//' comment line, but not in a multi-line comment, e.g., /* ?> */ ?-----Original Message----- From: Ed Gorski [mailto:gorskie@spjc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:46 PM To: Leotta Natalie (NCI/IMS); 'Jonathan Rosenberg'; Johnson, Kirk; php-general@lists.php.net Subject: RE: [PHP] comment followed by ?> fails to parse No the parser sees the ?> after a // because it needs to see when to quit out (unlike traditional, compiled languages) but it won't have this same effect in a string literal..... ed-- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php