Re: [GSOC] [benchmarks] GSoC report
| From: | Alexander Hjalmarsson | Date: | Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:30:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [GSOC] [benchmarks] GSoC report | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.gsoc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gsoc+get-125@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Hannes Magnusson <
hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 17:59, Alexander Hjalmarsson<hjalle@sgh.se> wrote:
> > Since the last report (about a week ago) I've tried to customize and get
> the
> > phpBB application to work in this scenario:
>
> Why exactly did you choose phpBB? - And what are the requirements of
> the application to be useful for you?
I chose it because it's widely used and would provide relevant data.. I
wanted to begin with an application that is pretty simple to deploy but yet
feature-rich (though I had some problems with the sessions, but I think I
might have solved it, using the way I described as "the first idea", pretty
much creating all sessions that are needed before I run siege)
>
>
> How about using an application that is little "closer to home", such
> as PhD, pearweb, phpweb..?
There's no reason why those applications couldn't take phpBB's place,
however I chose phpBB for the first application now. Could have been a bad
move, but apps like PhD could well be included later on.. One good thing is
that it won't be that hard to find a database for those applications.. :)
>
>
> -Hannes
>