Re: Why the libglade extension doesn't work

No idea, it's just what latest Glade 2 requires. It's been around since about February AFAIK. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrei Zmievski" <andrei@gravitonic.com> To: "Steph" <steph@zend.com> Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 11:56 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Why the libglade extension doesn't work > How widely available is ATK 1.9.0? Do most distributions have it? > > -Andrei > > > On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Steph wrote: > > > ps I just tried building against a full version of ATK 1.9.0 with my > > overrides patch and everything loads now, including the GladeXML > > class and > > something that thinks it's called Libglade :) > > > > Andrei, would you mind making 1.9.0 ATK rather than 1.8.0 > > required? It > > builds & works OK with that single change to the defs file. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steph" <steph@zend.com> > > To: "Andrei" <andrei@gravitonic.com> > > Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net> > > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:11 PM > > Subject: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Why the libglade extension doesn't work > > > > > > > >> The ATK library I'm building PHP-GTK 2 against has a function > >> missing, as > >> > > do > > > >> our own sources (presumably originating from ATK 1.8.0 or earlier). > >> > >> The libglade .dll was built against ATK 1.9.0, and references > >> (uses?) the > >> missing ATK function. > >> > >> Have written to Tor (who distributes the GTK+ dev headers and libs > >> we use > >> for win32)... the override's simple enough to add, but should I be > >> taking > >> this route? or trying to find another, possibly less recent, > >> libglade > >> distribution? > >> > >> - Steph > >> > >> -- > >> PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) > >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >> > >> > > > > -- > > PHP-GTK Development Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > >