Re: [PATCH] GtkNotebook-related stuff
| From: | Steph | Date: | Sun, 02 Oct 2005 16:09:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] GtkNotebook-related stuff | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.gtk.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-1731@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I only have one test to hand - the gtknotebook one, and that seems to work
regardless of whatever I throw at it :)
If anyone has any time/energy, it would be really useful to get some test
scripts for the signals listed below. Simon? Scott?
- Steph
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrei Zmievski" <andrei@gravitonic.com>
To: "Steph" <steph@zend.com>
Cc: "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] [PATCH] GtkNotebook-related stuff
> Can you test these methods with the latest CVS?
>
> -Andrei
>
> On Sep 17, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Steph wrote:
>
> > The signals potentially affected by this patch, apart from the
> > switch-page
> > signal in GtkNotebook which is fixed by it, are:
> >
> > insert-text signal (GtkEditable)
> > files-added signal (GtkFileSystem)
> > toggle-size-request signal (GtkMenuItem)
> > path-clicked signal (GtkPathBar)
> > input signal (GtkSpinButton)
> >
> > all of which contain a gpointer type parameter.
> >
> > The other place is gtk_tree_model_get_value(), which is unlikely to be
> > broken by the patch (because there isn't a way to set a gpointer as
> > a value
> > for a GtkTreeModel).
> >
> > If anyone has any scripts handy for testing the other signals
> > there, please
> > let me know. I've no idea how to test GtkFileSystem :)
> >
> > -
>