Re: Re: Modifying code

If you proove now that the current code generator will work with the new def format ... ;) I see it that the code generator has to be rewritten anyway. I've now nearly finished for every arg_type I needed it for to recognize type out. We can later change it anyway. On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:58:56PM +0800, Alan Knowles wrote : > caught james on #gnome - it's in the spec for defs2 > > (parameters > '("/arg-type/" "/arg-name/" [ "/access/" ] [ (default > "/default-val/") ] [ > (null-ok) ]) > ... > ) > > eg. > > (parameters > '("GdkColormap*" "cmap" "in") > ) > > he hasnt defined it - other than this example - but his response was : > in, out or inout > where the suggested values. > > regards > alan > > > Andrei Zmievski wrote: > > >On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Markus Fischer wrote: > > > >> My suggestion was to call the parameter 'return-value', you > >> suggest 'type out', I said its ok, I don't care how the > >> parameter is called as long as we have it now :) > >> > > > >Okay. That's just how parameters are marked in languages such as IDL, > >usually. In, out, or in/out. > > > >-Andrei > > > >What's hard, in hacking as in fiction, > >is not the writing, it's deciding what to write. > > -- Neal Stephenson > > > > -- Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.