re: PHP-GNOME part 1 is here!
| From: | Fernando Correa da Conceição | Date: | Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | re: PHP-GNOME part 1 is here! | ||
| Groups: | php.gtk.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-3435@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Dummy question: is this portable to windows?
Quoting Anant:
gtkscintilla2 work. I am using ubuntu 6.06 and it simple do not compile(on Suse 10.1 too not compile). Scintilla compiles well. Gtk scintilla is very old in comparassion with scintilla, and uses a old version of scintilla. But the more important is really choose one and have it working in windows/linux(the same version) so we can use it. And if possible, release ASAP a windows dll for it.Also, a gentle reminder that we must decide on: a) Which Scintilla version (Tom's or Mine) I really want the version from Tom. I allways had trouble to make the
is better as we do not force the people update gtk only to use php-gtk.b) Which Gtk+ version (2.6 or upgrade to 2.8, possibly even 2.10?) What are the differences? New widgets? I think if we can stay with 2.6
remove it from linux too I think if it does not work but the class is still there. The people will see the class and will try to use it, and will ask why it does not work. And, Anant, keep with the great job!!It would be great if we could pack in both Scintilla and the Gnome extensions by the time we reach a Beta release. And too GtkSourceView on windows, without the printing suport. We must