Re: Scintilla (Again)

Hi Fernando! > I too make the version from Tom work, the version that is build direct > from scintilla(without the GtkScintilla). I think that we can not have > both, so let us choose one one. Indeed. We wanted to decide on this earlier but I guess the issue was lost somewhere in the middle. > For me, we choose the version from Tom(sorry Anant), but it is more > recent, use the latest scintilla, and works on windows too. The general consensus seems to be towards Tom's version. I have to agree too, it is much simpler to link directly to Scintilla rather than GtkScintilla, especially given that GtkScintilla isn't maintained anymore. Trouble is, I can't get Tom's version to build on *nix here. I tried a couple of times earlier, but didn't really get anywhere. I'll replace my version with Tom's as soon as we get it to work on *nix. If Steph can confirm it works on Windows, she can commit that too. This shouldn't affect any of the end-users in any way. They won't even notice that the backend between the alpha-beta releases are different; except for the fact that they need one less dependency (gtkscintilla). -- Anant