Re: aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBPATH' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used
| From: | daemorhedron | Date: | Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:32:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBPATH' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.gtk.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-general+get-1804@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Don't know how much this helps at all, but keep in mind that that is my
intention. =)
I have this exact same problem with the cvs version also. I did make an
attempt to try a few things, and running > test -f php_gtk.m4 && rm
php_gtk.m4 as you suggested just seemed to yield in nothing.
I have php4.2.0rc4, although I really don't think that's the problem since
it's not making it through the ./buildconf.
using :
Autoconf version 2.13
automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p5
I don't know what else would be relevant, but if you need/want more info
please let me know.
HTH, thanks. =)
"Andrei Zmievski" <andrei@ispi.net> wrote in message
news:20020416090638.G9770@ispi.net...
> James Cameron wrote:
> > Tried a "make cvsclean", did a "cvs update" after removing all
> > .cvsignore files, confirming that my tree is empty of anything that
> > isn't from CVS. This fixed the previous issue ... and gave a new one;
> >
> > quozl:/usr/local/src/php-gtk$ ./buildconf
> > aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBPATH' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used
> > aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBRARY_WITH_PATH' defined in acinclude.m4 but
never used
> > aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBRARY' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used
> > aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_INCLUDE' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used
>
> This is normal with the old PHP build system, which you are apparently
> using.
>
> > make: *** [buildmk.stamp] Error 1
> > quozl:/usr/local/src/php-gtk$
>
> This is probably coming from the line in buil2/build.mk, that says:
>
> test -f php_gtk.m4 && rm php_gtk.m4
>
> Can you run that by hand and see what it does?
>
> -Andrei
>
> It is commonly the case with technologies that you can get
> the best insight about how they work by watching them fail.
> -- Neal Stephenson