Re: Code updates?

"Andrei Zmievski" <andrei@gravitonic.com> wrote in message news:8e672eeb6d0f863798668b51479b8c56@gravitonic.com... > Okay. I do want to mention that your code seems to be very object oriented > and has a complete separate class hierarchy (starting with I18NBase?). I > am not sure that we can use it as is in PHP. I think we discussed making > most of the ICU API procedural, with some OO parts. At the very least we > need a thorough review before we decide on anything. Not a problem. When i started, my goal was to adhere to the ICU C++ API, mainly for documentation and Java compatibility reasons (there's lots of code out there that would be easily adaptable). I personally prefer the OOP approach, but i'll work on whatever is decided. BTW - the I18NBase thing was simply a way of dealing with some nested object lifetime management issues, which i've found a easier way to resolve. Clayton > -Andrei > > On Feb 27, 2006, at 2:08 PM, l0t3k wrote: > >> Andrei, >> keep in mind that this is still very alpha level. Its a reconstruction >> of >> the most recent backup i could find after my machine crashed last year. >> >> Clayton >>