Re: apache 2 supported ?

With Apache 2, I on my Windows PC, I don't find that it preforms much better than Apache 1.3.27 and would stick with what your are currently using. "Daniel Wittenberg" <daniel-wittenberg@uiowa.edu> wrote in message news:1057729493.4530.0.camel@localhost.localdomain... > Thanks, that's the info I was looking for. I just needed to know if I > could trust it yet on a high-volume webmail (imp) server, and this tells > me no. Too bad - I'm anxious to start using Apache 2 for the > performance benefits. > > Thanks, > Dan > > On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 13:22, Stephen wrote: > > A number of people are using php 4.3 and Apache 2 successfully, but to my > > knowledge it is still in the "beta" testing stages. Basically, it works > > fairly well, but there may be unknown security risks. Use at your own risk. > > > > Stephen > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Daniel Wittenberg" <daniel-wittenberg@uiowa.edu> > > To: <php-install@lists.php.net> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:10 PM > > Subject: [PHP-INST] apache 2 supported ? > > > > > > > I saw on the website long ago that php wasn't recommended for production > > > environments due to the threading in 2.0. The emails I found in the > > > archive suggested this would be fixed in 4.3.0, since we're almost at > > > 4.3.3 is php safe yet to use with 2.0.46 yet ? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Dan > > > > > > -- > > > =========================== > > > Daniel Wittenberg > > > Senior Unix Admin > > > University of Iowa - ITS > > > > > > > > > -- > > > PHP Install Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Wittenberg <daniel-wittenberg@uiowa.edu> > The University of Iowa >