RE: Solaris 10 compile of php-5.6.x fails during make, using OracleStudio 12
| From: | J | Date: | Sat, 16 May 2015 01:05:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: Solaris 10 compile of php-5.6.x fails during make, using OracleStudio 12 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.install |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-install+get-20424@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Christoph,
Thanks for the suggestion. I reviewed the INSTALLATION file in the source tree and it had the same
flex/re2c hints for Solaris, but was not sure if it was applicable since the flex hint said up to
php-5.2. Flex 2.5.39,REV=2014.05.06 and re2c 0.13.5,REV=2012.03.15 were installed from the
solaris csw repositories, /opt/csw/bin was pre-pended to the PATH variable, and /opt/csw/lib was
pre-pended to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but make failed with the same result. Does anything else need to
be done to use the recently installed flex/re2c? Was there something in particular from the output
leading you to think it was flex and or re2c?
Also note there was a typo in my original description, what built correctly an hour or so ago from
the 5.5.x tree was 5.5.25 not 5.5.41.
John
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 02:12:10 +0200
> From: cmbecker69@gmx.de
> To: mm_half3@live.com; php-install@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: Solaris 10 compile of php-5.6.x fails during make, using OracleStudio 12
>
> J wrote:
>
>> Have tried to compile two versions of the php-5.6.x tree on Solaris
>> 10, and both failed in the make process throwing out in target
>> Zend/zend_language_scanner.lo. The first attempt was tried in
>> March with 5.6.7. Tried with 5.6.9 with similar results.
>> Environment is: Solaris 10 x86, cc: Sun C 5.12 SunOS_i386,
>> httpd-2.4.12, apr-1.5.2, apr-util-1.5.4. The configure command used
>> is: ../php-5.6.9/configure --prefix=/apache
>> -with-apxs2=/apache/bin/apxs --enable-opcache=no . The make
>> output before the fatal error are below. After the failure of
>> 5.6.7 tried the 5.5 source tree and 5.5.23 built without errors.
>> Going to try 5.5.41 shortly.....however would like to be able to
>> build the 5.6.x tree. Any suggestions?
>
> From having a quick glance at the issue, the problem might be related to
> an incompatible flex/re2c; check the requirements on
> .
>
> Please do not send multipart or even HTML mails to this list – they
> might not display well; plain text is usually preferable.
>
> --
> Christoph M. Becker
>