RE: [PHP-INST] Which One?

From: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 19:43:48 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP-INST] Which One?
References: 1  Groups: php.install 
Request: Send a blank email to php-install+get-2433@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
first of all, running PHP as a module is always faster than the CGI Version. The CGI is loaded and unloaded for every page-request ... the module version sits in the main memory ;) My experience is, that apache is very stable under w2k ;), but this is only a personal thing ;) ... > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Powell [mailto:kevin@o-positive.com] > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:37 PM > To: php-install@lists.php.net > Subject: [PHP-INST] Which One? > > > Hello all, > > I have a question that I'm sure most of you have encountered > before. I'm running PHP4 on Windows 2000. Which web server is > best to use, IIS 5 or Apache for WinNT? Which is more > faster/stable? And, should I run PHP as a module or as CGI? > > Thanks! > > > kevin powell > voice 208>387>0152 x221 > fax 208>387>2671 > kevin@o-positive.com >

« previous php.install (#2433) next »