Re: GD vs Imagick

From: Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:13:11 +0000
Subject: Re: GD vs Imagick
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-100227@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Le 15/08/2017 à 12:52, Rasmus Schultz a écrit : > I am starting to wonder why GD is the default in PHP? Don't really know, perhaps because the first one ? But we have various alternatives: - imagick - gmagick - vips (perhaps others) And ImageMagick is really an ugly upstream - most common commit message is "..." [1] - unstable API (imagick extension even check that build version === runtime versions) - soname bump in patch version (yes, really, when 4th digit change) - lack of CI (else I don't understand how they can release with broken tests [2]) And about extensions: - imagick conflicts with gmagick (as GraphicMagick is a fork of ImageMagick, you cannot load both in the same process), so having imagick the default one will kill gmagick. [1] https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commits/master [2] https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aclosed%20author%3Aremicollet%20

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
« previous php.internals (#100227) next »