Re: Matching PDO_SQLite features with SQLite3 extension
| From: | Christoph M. Becker | Date: | Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:55:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Matching PDO_SQLite features with SQLite3 extension | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-100296@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 24.08.2017 at 00:06, Adam Baratz wrote:
>> That change was implemented in the SQLite3 extension without a RFC, so I'm
>> quite confused here.
>
> My literal reading of the contribution guide[1] is that new features should
> be preceded by an RFC, though there are certainly cases where this doesn't
> happen. I don't have a clear enough understanding of this community to say
> when RFCs can be skipped. I'm not sure who the authority would be. The
> release manager for the next minor rev? Anyone with commit privileges?
It seems to me this is rather simple: if a feature is uncontroversial,
it doesn't need an RFC. Since nobody objected against PR #2528, it was
merged (after some weeks). However, there have been objections against
PR #2698, so an RFC appears to be appropriate.
--
Christoph M. Becker