Re: hash_hkdf() signature and return value

On 6 September 2017 at 02:15, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote: > What should we do for this? Not us, you. You should start listening to other people's feedback. You continually refuse to accept any feedback that doesn't agree with your world-view, not only on the subject of hkdf, but on validation and other things you think are "MANDATORY" You should respect RFC votes and stop bringing up the same discussions over and over again. This is incredibly tedious. In particular your suggestion about hash_hkdf was rejected unanimously, apart from your own vote https://wiki.php.net/rfc/improve_hash_hkdf_parameter and so probably shouldn't be brought up for discussion, except if you can bring new facts for discussion. "Not liking the result of the vote" is not a new fact to discuss. Additionally though, your ideas about adding validation/filter functions as a C extension, rather than implementing them in PHP have also been resoundingly rejected, https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_validate_functions_to_filter and yet you continue to promote the idea. This is also tedious. This pattern of behaviour, continually refusing to accept that other people have opinions that don't align with yours, and continually bringing up the same topics for discussion over, and over, and over again is not productive. It does not make people want to engage you in discussion, as it is a waste of their time. This is not something other people can fix for you. cheers Dan Ack