Re: [RFC][Discuss] Increase non-syntax runtime-impacting RFC voting threshold to 60%
| From: | Remi Collet | Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:13:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][Discuss] Increase non-syntax runtime-impacting RFC voting threshold to 60% | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-100579@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 13/09/2017 à 22:42, Sara Golemon a écrit :
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rfc.voting-threshold
>
> This topic has come up on the mailing list a few times, so I'd like to
> formally open the topic for discussion.
>
> I'm generally pretty liberal when it comes to allowing the PHP
> language to evolve and explore its identity, but the truth is a
> feature that has 30 people vote against it and 31 people vote in favor
> of it is not a mandate by any stretch of the imagination.
+1, such result show we fail to have a good consensus,
and that ~50% will be unhappy.
So indeed, having a higher threshold seems a good idea.
Remi
> It's an
> opportunity to examine why a divide exists and if we're all being
> honest with each other, improve the original idea before it becomes a
> maintenance burden.
>
> Please note the "Open Question". I'm not all that sure 60% is enough
> of a mandate either, but I wanted to be conservative in my
> conservatism. If folks think 2/3 is more appropriate (and consistent
> with syntax changes), I'm happy to change this number before we move
> to voting phase.
>
> -Sara
>
> Or, as Ze'ev once famously said, "Give the language a rest".
>
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc