Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Strong Typing Syntax

On 10.01.2018 at 17:22, Rowan Collins wrote: > On 10 January 2018 at 15:54, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote: > >> On 10.01.2018 at 15:09, Rowan Collins wrote: >> >>> I'll also echo a previous request that you apply for a wiki account to >> make your document more readable; or maybe just put it as a github gist or >> on your own website, and treat it as more of a wishlist and discussion >> piece than a spec that core developers are going to commit to. >> >> That is, however, not necessarily sufficient. There are already several >> accepted RFC with pending implementation[1], the oldest of which had >> been accepted in 2011 and 2012, respectively. > > Sufficient for what? I was just saying it would be easier to read online in > a versioned doc than in the bodies of a series of e-mails. Sorry for badly quoting. I fully agree that using another medium for drafting the RFC other than this list would be preferable. However, I wanted to point out that it might not even make sense to do so, until someone has been found who is willing and able :) to actually write a suitable implementation. -- Christoph M. Becker