Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Deprecation of fallback to root scope
| From: | Marco Pivetta | Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2018 14:43:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Deprecation of fallback to root scope | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-101776@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Michael Morris <tendoaki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Michael Morris <tendoaki@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The problem is that behavior has been around so long that any attempt to
>>> change it would incur a massive amount of changes. Using the E_STRICT
>>> notice level instead of E_DEPRECATED has been floated as one fix for
>>> this,
>>> but this doesn't change the fact that major applications and frameworks,
>>> such as Drupal, pride themselves in being able to pass all tests even
>>> with
>>> E_STRICT enabled. The maintainers of these projects would be annoyed to
>>> say
>>> the least to need to fix thousands of lines of code to get back to that
>>> point, and downstream projects such as Drupal could end up waiting years
>>> for all their upstream libraries to get their act together.
>>>
>>
>> Much like any upgrade requiring patches for full compliance with newer
>> PHP versions, it needs work.
>>
>> The typical workflow is:
>>
>> * add PHP.NEXT to the CI setup
>> * run everything through the tests again, figure out how much has broken
>> * fix it
>>
>> In this case, we even *already* have *multiple* tools that automatically
>> fix this problem in one shot.
>>
>> Since the two issues are somewhat tied, why not bind them to a
>>> configuration flag following the pattern that was used to ultimately
>>> remove
>>> register_globals functionality from the language? At this point let it
>>> be
>>> known that when constant/function overloaders hit a php.ini config option
>>> will be added to turn them on -- and turning them on will turn global
>>> scoping for functions off.
>>>
>>
>> Argh
>>
>>
> Agreed, but you can't just pull the rug out from under people. It's
> painful, but it's better to let people opt in to such a major change than
> to "break" their code.
>
We're talking about a deprecation, not removal of a feature.
First of all, it doesn't remove the feature, which means that everything
keeps working as-is, and second, we already have a way to configure error
reporting for deprecations ("configuration") ;-)
The point of deprecations is precisely to give downstream time to adjust
and release the adapted code, which we do all the time anyway.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/