Re: FPM maintainership?
| From: | Remi Collet | Date: | Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:29:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: FPM maintainership? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-101895@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Le 21/02/2018 à 10:21, Michael Wallner a écrit :
> I'd like to second that. Given the past development of heading away from
> SAPIs loaded into the webserver to FastCGI being preferred,
+1
> we should be
> giving FPM the deserved priority. Does anyone have stats about the
> popularity of our SAPIs?
I don't really have statistic, but Fedora use FPM by default (mod_php is
available but disabled) since F27 (mostly because httpd have switched to
event mode by default, which is now required for mod_http2).
> I also have a patch I'd like to discuss with the new maintainers, which
> attempts to fix FPM's SIGUSR2 graceful restart behaviour, and which
> we've been running for half a year now IIRC.
Any link to the patch ?
Remi
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc