Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Immutability
| From: | Silvio Marijić | Date: | Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:29:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] Immutability | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-101924@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I had discussion on Twitter regarding semantics of keyword 'immutable'.
I am considering now to replace keyword 'immutable' with 'value'.
How would you compare those two, which one is more suitable here?
On Feb 25, 2018 6:24 PM, "Silvio Marijić" <marijic.silvio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> So far that is still only assumption made based on the fact that most of
> the code for protecting state is composed of bit checks but I am definitely
> interested to see benchmark for this RFC.
>
> Best regards,
>
> On Feb 25, 2018 5:49 PM, "Dan Ackroyd" <danack@basereality.com> wrote:
>
> On 23 February 2018 at 13:47, Silvio Marijić <marijic.silvio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > In addition to your question about impact on the performance, there is
> > none.
>
> Have you actually measured that there is no performance impact, or is
> that an assumption from what affect the code should have?
>
> cheers
> Dan
>
>
>