Re: PHP FFI extenesion

From: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 07:31:28 +0000
Subject: Re: PHP FFI extenesion
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-102075@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hey Dmitry! On 17/04/18 09:29, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > hi Michael, > > it's pitty, I didn't found this extension before. > thanks for pointing, I'll definetly take a look. Did you have a chance to look at it yet? > I, also, like the idea of preloading ffi definitions on startup, but I > would prefer to allow preloading any php files. Especially for FFI, PHP > wrappers would able to hide dangerous implementation details. > I'm not sure the one depends on the other, and how would that be different to opcache? With PSI everything related C is encapsulated, you cannot change anything regarding the access or calling scheme at runtime. I admit, PSI is far away from being optimized or even finished yet, but there are a few important key differentiation points: - the system administrator controls FFI - parses C headers, no need to duplicate declarations - function call and data access is pre-defined, not at runtime -- Regards, Mike

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
« previous php.internals (#102075) next »