Re: [RFC] abolish narrow margins
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:10:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] abolish narrow margins | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-102781@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hey Sara,
Sara Golemon wrote:
I don't remember the specifics about integer semantics (which fell precisely on 2/3 and thus would have failed the +1 check), but again I'll offer than perhaps both needed more discussion, and maybe shouldn't have passed. *shrug* -Sara2/3+1 is silly, though. 2/3 already means there's twice as many agreeing as disagreeing, having +1 doesn't serve the tie-breaking function there that it does for 50%+1. But that was indeed a knife-edge RFC, it was actually saved by someone chosing to vote Yes at the last minute. -- Andrea Faulds https://ajf.me/